Hydrophysics

Hydrophysics

Determination of vessel unit number in river transportation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student. Department of civil, Payame Noor University, Tehran North Unit, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of civil, Payame Noor University, Tehran North Unit, Tehran, Iran.
3 University of Detroit Mercy.
Abstract
The optimal number of vessels and navigation equipment required for carrying cargo in the Karun River has been investigated in this research. At the beginning of the research, the limited studies that have been done for economic transportation in Karun have been analyzed. Then, three pessimistic, probable and optimistic values ​​have been assumed for the annual load carried by the river. Then, various proposed vessels for transportation from Arvand and Bahman Shir routes and from different sources (Mahshahr or Khorramshahr to Ahvaz and vice versa) and all types of navigation equipment have been examined. The number and types of vessels needed for river transport of different tonnages were analyzed economically. In the studies, attention has been paid to the amount of sediment required for the dimensions of the waterway channel, possible navigation speeds, factors reducing the navigation speed such as monsoon winds, dust and drought, and other variables. Finally, the specifications of the required navigation equipment have been determined and the number of floats required for the river traffic from Bandar Imam, Bahman Shir, Ahvaz to transport 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 million tons of goods (iron ore) respectively equal to 5, 10, 20, 34 and 67 devices are estimated. The practical and optimal result of this research is the use of 7 vessel units with the proposed dimensions intended to carry 0.7 million tons of goods in the target year of 2046.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. منصوری کیا محمدتقی، انصاری زهرا. امکان‌سنجی ترابری آبی در آبراه کارون. مجموعه مقالات چهارمین کنگره ملی مهندسی عمران، ایران. 1387؛19(1):7-1.
  2. Mansouri Kia M, Sheibani H, Hoback A. Initial Maintenance Notes about the First River Ship Lock in Iran. Journal of Hydraulic and Water 2024;5(1):143-162.
  3. منصوری کیا محمدتقی، رجبی الهام، شیبانی حمیدرضا. تعیین ابعاد بهینه کانال ترابری رودخانه‌ای در ایران. مجموعه مقالات چهارمین همایش بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و شهر سبز پایدار، همدان، ایران. 1398؛7(1):27-20.
  4. Liu B, Yang J, Huang Y, Wang L. Hydraulic Research on Filling and Emptying System of Water-Saving Ship Lock for Navigation-Power Junction in Mountainous River & Smart Rivers. Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering. 2022;3(2):1492-1501.
  5. Mäck A, Lorke A. Ship‐lock induced surges in an impounded river and their impact on subdaily flow velocity variation. Journal of River research and applications. 2014;30(4):494-507.
  6. Ables J. Filling and Emptying System, New Ship Lock, Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana Hydraulic Model Investigation. Journal of US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. 1978;14(1):20-26.
  7. Hu Q, Li Y, Zhu L. Effect of Parameters of Ditch Geometry on the Uniformity of Water Filling in Ship Lock Chambers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024;12(1):86.
  8. Iuorio L. The frenzy and legacy of modern infrastructures along the Klamath and Allegheny Rivers. Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering. 2024;2(2):1-26.
  9. منصوری کیا محمدتقی. مطالعه مقایسه‌ای و به‌روز شده ترابری آبی رودخانه‌ای در ایران. سازمان آب و برق خوزستان، گزارش فنی وزارت نیرو. 1397؛5(2):15-1.
  10. Gilardoni O, Presedo P. Navigation in Shallow Waters Livingston. Journal of Witherby Publishing Group. 2017;3(1):8-12.
  11. Tomislav Bilić. The Myth of Alpheus and Arethusa and Open Sea Voyages on the Mediterranean. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology. 2009; 4(2):116-132.
  12. https://kashtidaran.com/
  13. Arguin W. Cg Navcen Work Instruction. Journal of Techniques and Procedures united states coast guard Waterway Analysis Tactics. 2022;5(1):1-6.
  14. صفر قلی امیرحسین، محمدی اکبر. آمارنامه دریایی ایران. تهران: مرکز نشر ستاد توسعه فناوری و صنایع دانش بنیان دریایی؛ 1396. ص. 50، 57، 63، 72، 105-102.
  15. Sweco Mahab Company limited. Final technical Report of Feasibility study. 1976;3(1)25-96.
  16. مهندسین مشاور سازه پردازی ایران. مطالعات ترابری رودخانه‌ای، طراحی هندسی و لایروبی آبراه. گزارش تخصصی. 1383؛1(1): ص. 85-10.
  17. Adab Danan. Consulting company. Study Economic Data Request for KWPA. 2004; 29-93.
  18. Scott wiIson Piesold. Consulting company. karun river, Interim Report No 6. Transportation component. 2005;21(4):50-63.
  19. International Navigation Association (PIANC). Factors Involved in Standardizing the Dimensions of Class Vb Inland Waterways (Canals). Report of Working Group No 20. 1999; 5(8):28-32.
  20. Raaymakers ES, Gregory C. 1st East Asia Regional Workshop on Ballast Water Control and Management, Beijing, China, 31 Oct-2 Nov. 2002: Workshop Report. Globallast Monograph Series 6. London: International Maritime Organization; 2002:6.
  21. Wang J, Li JY. Inland waterway transport in the pearl river basin, China. Espace géographique. 2012 Oct;41(3):196-209.
  22. Fathoni M, Pradono P, Syabri I, Shanty Y.R. Analysis to assess potential rivers for cargo transport in Indonesia. World Conference on Transport Research – WCTR. 2016 July 10;4544-58.
  23. Vilarinho A, Liboni LB, Siegler J. Challenges and opportunities for the development of river logistics as a sustainable alternative: a systematic review. Transportation Research Procedia. 2019 Jan 1;39:584.
  24. Cacaud P. Conditions of work in inland navigation in Southeast Asia (the case of the Mekong River system). The International Labour Organization (ILO); 2021 Dec 7:10-17-20-54-55
  25. Brown N. Remarkable facts and figures about the world today and in 20 years time. Journal News and information for the marine industry a Lloyd’s register Qinetiq and strathclyde Glasco university Global Marine Trends. 2013; 2(4):20.
Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 17
February 2024
Pages 89-104

  • Receive Date 29 June 2024
  • Revise Date 01 December 2024
  • Accept Date 08 December 2024